From: Márton Németh <[email protected]>

The function calls spin_lock() and spin_unlock() should be in pair. This patch 
makes
this pairing more clear for the reader of the code.

Signed-off-by: Márton Németh <[email protected]>
---
diff --git a/drivers/staging/usbip/stub_rx.c b/drivers/staging/usbip/stub_rx.c
index a5c1fa1..e2cfedb 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/usbip/stub_rx.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/usbip/stub_rx.c
@@ -304,18 +304,18 @@ static int stub_recv_cmd_unlink(struct stub_device *sdev,
 static int valid_request(struct stub_device *sdev, struct usbip_header *pdu)
 {
        struct usbip_device *ud = &sdev->ud;
+       int valid = 0;

        if (pdu->base.devid == sdev->devid) {
                spin_lock(&ud->lock);
                if (ud->status == SDEV_ST_USED) {
                        /* A request is valid. */
-                       spin_unlock(&ud->lock);
-                       return 1;
+                       valid = 1;
                }
                spin_unlock(&ud->lock);
        }

-       return 0;
+       return valid;
 }

 static struct stub_priv *stub_priv_alloc(struct stub_device *sdev,
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to