On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 05:39:42PM +0100, walter harms wrote: > > - memset(&(msg1.bssid.data), 0xFF, sizeof(p80211item_pstr6_t)); > > + memset(&msg1.bssid.data, 0xFF, sizeof(msg1.bssid.data)); > > msg1.bssid.data.len = 6; > > maybe msg1.bssid.data.len is related to msg1.bssid.data ? > I guess sizeof(msg1.bssid.data)-1 (why -1). > > perhaps you can fix both ? >
It's an interesting point. The problem is that I don't actually have this hardware. On the patch which I sent, it was obvious what the intent. My guess is that msg1.bssid.data[] should have 6 elements instead of 7, but I don't feel confident enough to sign off on that. Let's fix this bug which is obvious and let someone who knows how to fix that other question address it. regards, dan carpenter
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
