On 07/23/2012 01:44 PM, Ramirez Luna, Omar wrote:
Hi Justin,
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Justin P. Mattock
<justinmatt...@gmail.com> wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/staging/tidspbridge/core/tiomap3430.c
b/drivers/staging/tidspbridge/core/tiomap3430.c
index f9609ce..2c82d5a 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/tidspbridge/core/tiomap3430.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/tidspbridge/core/tiomap3430.c
@@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ static int bridge_brd_read(struct bridge_dev_context
*dev_ctxt,
ul_num_bytes, mem_type);
return status;
}
- /* copy the data from DSP memory, */
+ /* copy the data from DSP memory, */
I guess we can get rid of the comma (,) at the end of this sentence.
good catch!
...
diff --git a/drivers/staging/tidspbridge/include/dspbridge/proc.h
b/drivers/staging/tidspbridge/include/dspbridge/proc.h
index a82380e..9cd5022 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/tidspbridge/include/dspbridge/proc.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/tidspbridge/include/dspbridge/proc.h
@@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ extern int proc_get_processor_id(void *proc, u32 * proc_id);
* Returns:
* 0 : Success.
* -EFAULT : Invalid processor handle.
- * -EPERM : General failure while retireving processor trace
+ * -EPERM : General failure while retireing processor trace
This was meant to be 'retrieving'.
And given that this is focused on tidspbridge, could you change the
patch subject? To: staging: tidspbridge: fix typos.
Cheers,
Omar
ah.. I see now.. comments can be tough to decipher sometimes with what
the writer is saying, helps to know what the code is doing.
cheers, resending the revised version, and Thank you for taking the time.
Justin P. Mattock
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
