On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 04:28:36PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jan Beulich [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 11:51 AM > > To: KY Srinivasan; Michael S. Tsirkin > > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > > [email protected]; [email protected]; > > [email protected]; > > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] > > Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/3] X86: Add a check to catch Xen emulation of Hyper-V > > > > >>> On 17.04.13 at 17:31, KY Srinivasan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > If Xen were to change where it would not unconditionally emulate Hyper-V, > > > I > > > would not be opposed to taking > > > this check out. > > > > But it doesn't do this unconditionally, only upon admin request. > > >From the discussion we had a couple of months ago, the default setting was > >to enable > Hyper-V emulation for all guests. If this is not the case, we ought to be > able to drop this. > However, I think it is not reasonable to add additional checks (in addition > to hypervisor check) > to customize the run-time in the guest for the specific Hypervisor. > > Regards, > > K. Y
Parse error. What are you trying to say? I'm just saying it's best to do things in the way that make it possible for Xen to implement hyperv in a more complete way in the future and have things just work and in a way that does not change guest/hypervisor interface. > > > > Jan > > > > > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
