Am Samstag, den 16.01.2010, 16:01 +0100 schrieb Christoph Wickert: > I know that APRT is still very young technology, but after 2 months it's > time for a interim conclusion. For me the conclusions are: > > Pro: > > * abrt is a help for developers: I received one positive feedback > from a developer: The backtrace looks "interesting" but cannot > be fixed without a major rewrite of the app. > > * abrt helps to fix bugs sometimes: So far abrt helped me to fix > three crashes in two apps (in Fedora and upstream). > > Con: > > * Unfortunately 3 out of ~ 40 reports is not a good percentage. > > * As already pointed out by Michael Schwendt some time ago, there > were some good traces in the beginning but then they became > unusable. Starting with abrt 1.0.2 it got better again but I > still get bogus reports sometimes. > > * As a maintainer abrt causes a lot of work. You have to respond > to the tickets, ask for details, explain how to install > debuginfo manually and tell people that their > > * abrt is frustrating for maintainers: Upstream refuses to accept > the backtraces generated by abrt. Happened to me three times. > > * abrt is frustrating for users: Today I received my first "No > need for a reply...I will stop submitting tickets."
Yeah. You're absolutely right with this. My complaint is that
* abrt will report nearly equal reports for one app crashing
on different occasions and no "normal" being will be able to
figure out, if her/his problem already is reported
Oh, and
* This icon is ugly.
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
