On Sun, 2010-02-21 at 15:21 -0500, Braden McDaniel wrote: > I can do this; but I don't understand why the existence of > libopenvrml-devel and its "Obsoletes: openvrml-devel" aren't sufficient.
This isn't the reason, but as a general note, unversioned obsoletes are almost always a bad idea, as they make it more painful to use the other name in future (which you always think you'll never need to do, and then it turns out...maybe you will). As a rule of thumb, always version your obsoletes. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
