On 3/1/2010 11:42 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I will note again that 0 karma doesn't mean that it's not been tested. > > I run here with updates-testing enabled, but often only report -karma > when things break. There are just so many things in updates-testing, > that I usually don't have time or energy to +1 all of them that work. >
I do the same. One big issue with giving positive karma is that you probably aren't testing all use-cases for the software, so I'm hesitant to +1 just because it didn't explode. It's important to know though that is *didn't* explode (which certainly would result in negative karma from any testers out there. I still think there aren't enough testers, but neither should every tester give +1 to every package. - Orion -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
