On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote: > You mean the KDE stability proposal? As this is F11, i.e. "previous stable", > KDE 4.4 would actually not have been pushed to F11 under that proposal. How i read it, you would still push *one* feature release in the middle of stable release lifespan, right? How that's going to solve anything as upstream *intentionally* pushes stuff into it to break things? Even they don't expect you to do what you do. Tuju -- Ajatteleva ihminen tarvitsee unta. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
- Re: Harmless KDE feature up... Adam Williamson
- Re: Harmless KDE feature upgrad... Peter Jones
- Re: Harmless KDE feature up... Rahul Sundaram
- Re: Harmless KDE feature up... Peter Jones
- Re: Harmless KDE feature up... Jesse Keating
- Re: Harmless KDE feature up... Peter Jones
- Re: Harmless KDE feature up... Kevin Kofler
- Re: Harmless KDE feature upgrades - ... Jesse Keating
- Re: Harmless KDE feature upgrad... Kevin Kofler
- Re: Harmless KDE feature upgrades - yeah right Kevin Kofler
- Re: Harmless KDE feature upgrades - yeah right Juha Tuomala
- Re: Harmless KDE feature upgrades - yeah rig... Kevin Kofler
- Re: Harmless KDE feature upgrades - yeah rig... Jaroslav Reznik
- Re: Harmless KDE feature upgrades - yeah rig... Rex Dieter
- Re: Harmless KDE feature upgrades - yeah right Petrus de Calguarium
- Re: Harmless KDE feature upgrades - yeah right Kevin Kofler
- Re: Harmless KDE feature upgrades - yeah right Mike McGrath
- Re: Harmless KDE feature upgrades - yeah rig... Kevin Kofler
- Re: Harmless KDE feature upgrades - yeah... Chris Adams
- Re: Harmless KDE feature upgrades - yeah... Jesse Keating
- Re: Harmless KDE feature upgrades - yeah right Richard W.M. Jones