On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Adam Williamson <awill...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2010-04-05 at 10:28 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 10:48:39PM +0200, Felix Schwarz wrote: >> >> > since the last stable kernel update in Fedora 12, a lot of Dell machines >> > do not boot anymore due to a kernel oops... Of course bugzilla has a >> > couple of bug reports (e.g. #578217, #579118, #578663, #578590). >> > >> > There is a known fix/workaround which is already present in CVS >> > (kernel-2.6.32.10-94.fc12) and a koji build which fixes the issue for >> > all users. However there's no update in bodhi yet. >> > >> > Due to the severity of the problem, I'd like to see a push to >> > updates-testing as soon as possible. >> >> Thanks, Felix. I have created the update. >> >> Since I created the problem for the b44 people in kernel -90, I >> wanted to be sure to get some positive test reports before pushing >> the -94 update. I apologize for the extended delay over the weekend! > > From what I can tell, it looks like the -90 update got 'auto-pushed' by > hitting +3 karma, despite the fact that two people had reported the > regression in Bodhi. This is a classic case of 'works for me' positive > feedback overriding 'there's a regression!' feedback, which is one of > the issues we're trying to fix with the proposals to improve Bodhi. > > For now, might I suggest disabling auto-push for kernel updates?
Even more fun, the request was initially submitted and told to ignore karma for auto-push, but the initial submission had an incorrect bug number in it. Went in to fix that, and apparently didn't notice that bodhi had helpfully decided to re-enable the auto-push check box when all I wanted to do was fix a bug number. (in other words, "edit" doesn't properly honor the current settings of the ticket). -- Jarod Wilson ja...@wilsonet.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel