But it should be explicitly stated anyway. Legalese isn't English. Note: IANAL
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Matt McCutchen <m...@mattmccutchen.net>wrote: > On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 16:15 -0500, charles zeitler wrote: > > i looked at this (and the MIT license) didn't see any explicit reference > > to source code! (e.g. , that it must be made available.) > > Indeed. For an MIT licensing regime to be considered "free", the > original author must provide the source. But being non-copyleft, the > license does not require distributors of derived works to provide > source. > > I can't imagine Fedora accepting a contribution in binary form, so I > believe this is a non-issue. > > -- > Matt > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
