On 05/04/2010 01:50 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:You must all realize that the ratio of bureaucracy/process burden and quality of maintainers/packagers go hand in hand. The better the maintainers/packagers/components are less bureaucracy/process burden is needed. The worse it gets more bureaucracy/process burden is needed. If ye all feel that the bureaucracy/process burden is increasing that only means that the quality of maintainers and their components is going down.. ( we might be getting more components inn in less quality ).If our maintainers suck, bureaucracy is not a good solution to fix that problem.But we already have a group of trusted maintainers, it's called "provenpackager". We could give provenpackagers the power to push directly to stable without any karma requirements.
Given the requirements FESCo + if they checks on the bugzilla activity of the individual that wants to become a provenpackager and take that into consideration when approving the request I dont see why not.
So basically it would be like this..If you are a provenpackager you have the power to push directly to stable without any karma requirements however if you are not a provenpackager you will have to follow what ever procedure FESCo RELeng and QA come up with at any given time until you have been accepted as a provenpackager by FESCo.
Sounds like a draft to a solution everyone can agree with? JBG
<<attachment: johannbg.vcf>>
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
