On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 20:23 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > So, I know a lot of you out there hate bugzilla flags, but I think we > have problem with the current way we manage release blocker issues, and > flags offer a potential solution. > > First the problem: > > Right now, anybody can propose a release blocker bug. This is not the > problem though, the problem is that developers (and testers) have no > good queryable method to determine whether the proposed blocker has been > accepted or not. Why is this important? Well some (all?) developers > have finite time, and our release cycle is also finite. Therefor its > important that they work on the issues we would actually stop the > release for. As a reporter it's also worth knowing if the bug in > question will delay the release or not, so that a workaround could be > researched and documented.
Does that have anything to do with me adding 2 bugs to the blockers the day before the go/no-go meeting? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
