On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 02:42 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 05/13/2010 02:37 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > There was an open ticket requesting Pino. There was not anything from > > the maintainers requesting the games. > > > > I did mention this on IRC but what is the criteria for pulling in the > updates? If I knew what would be reasonable to request, it would help > for future releases. I am also looking for guidelines on, what updates > are considered a good thing. Is the game update a problem?
The problem is there aren't really criteria, it's a very squishy thing. We usually take at least one not-strictly-a-blocker fix during the RC phase of a release, based on a sort of instinctive judgement call that gets kicked around between QA and rel-eng. It's really really hard to codify this, because there's just so many parameters. We did a decent job, I think, of codifying the issues that can really block a release, but the risk vs. benefit calculation involved in 'should we take this fix for this spin' is a massively more difficult thing to codify :/ if someone wants to try that would be awesome, but honestly I wouldn't know where to start. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
