22.05.2010 17:28, Hans de Goede пишет:
> Hi,
>
> On 05/17/2010 03:13 AM, Chen Lei wrote:
>    
>>
>> 2010/5/16 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)<fo...@hubbitus.com.ru
>> <mailto:fo...@hubbitus.com.ru>>
>>
>>
>>      About ABI breakage there separate problem in ImageMagick -
>>      
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-bugs-d...@lists.debian.org/msg736218.html
>>      So, upstream is not carefully there and I never can't guarantee what
>>      there no ABI breakage in any update...
>>
>>      P.S. It seams it does not hit list, i post mail again. It is reason
>>      such big delay...
>>
>>      --
>>
>> Normally, if the update is a pure bugfix release,  it's safe to update
>> and don't need a rebuild, and you should update them on rawhide as well
>> as stable branches to fix bugs
>> If API/ABI is changed, only the following packages need a rebuild.
>> Packages depends on ImageMagick itself actually don't need a rebuild
>> even the API is changed.
>>      
> Wrong, the main ImageMagick provides libs too, on F-13 the full list is:
> [h...@localhost anaconda]$ repoquery -q --whatrequires 
> 'libMagickCore.so.2()(64bit)' 'libMagickWand.so.2()(64bit)' 
> 'libMagick++.so.2()(64bit)'
> ruby-RMagick-0:2.13.1-1.fc13.1.x86_64
> ImageMagick-djvu-0:6.5.8.10-6.fc13.x86_64
> vips-tools-0:7.20.7-1.fc13.x86_64
> rss-glx-0:0.9.1.p-2.fc13.x86_64
> q-magick-0:7.11-6.fc12.x86_64
> nip2-0:7.20.7-3.fc13.x86_64
> ale-0:0.9.0.3-2.fc12.x86_64
> zbar-0:0.10-2.fc13.x86_64
> psiconv-0:0.9.8-5.fc12.x86_64
> xastir-1:1.9.6-3.fc13.x86_64
> ImageMagick-c++-0:6.5.8.10-6.fc13.x86_64
> ImageMagick-perl-0:6.5.8.10-6.fc13.x86_64
> vips-0:7.20.7-1.fc13.x86_64
> autotrace-0:0.31.1-23.fc12.x86_64
> inkscape-view-0:0.47-6.fc13.x86_64
> k3d-0:0.8.0.1-1.fc13.x86_64
> drawtiming-0:0.7.1-1.fc13.x86_64
> dx-libs-0:4.4.4-15.fc13.x86_64
> dx-0:4.4.4-15.fc13.x86_64
> pfstools-0:1.8.1-1.fc13.x86_64
> gdl-python-0:0.9-0.10.rc4.fc13.x86_64
> oxine-0:0.7.1-6.fc13.x86_64
> xine-lib-extras-0:1.1.18.1-1.fc13.x86_64
> transcode-0:1.1.5-4.fc13.x86_64
> ImageMagick-devel-0:6.5.8.10-6.fc13.x86_64
> imageinfo-0:0.05-10.fc12.x86_64
> vips-python-0:7.20.7-1.fc13.x86_64
> calibre-0:0.6.42-1.fc13.x86_64
> pfstools-imgmagick-0:1.8.1-1.fc13.x86_64
> php-pecl-imagick-0:2.2.2-4.fc12.x86_64
> inkscape-0:0.47-6.fc13.x86_64
> php-magickwand-0:1.0.8-4.fc12.x86_64
> k3d-0:0.7.11.0-6.fc13.x86_64
> gdl-0:0.9-0.10.rc4.fc13.x86_64
> zbar-0:0.10-2.fc13.x86_64
> transcode-0:1.1.5-4.fc13.x86_64
> ImageMagick-devel-0:6.5.8.10-6.fc13.x86_64
> vips-python-0:7.20.7-1.fc13.x86_64
> calibre-0:0.6.42-1.fc13.x86_64
> ImageMagick-c++-0:6.5.8.10-6.fc13.x86_64
> vips-tools-0:7.20.7-1.fc13.x86_64
> rss-glx-0:0.9.1.p-2.fc13.x86_64
> vips-0:7.20.7-1.fc13.x86_64
> php-magickwand-0:1.0.8-4.fc12.x86_64
> oxine-0:0.7.1-6.fc13.x86_64
> nip2-0:7.20.7-3.fc13.x86_64
> xine-lib-extras-0:1.1.18.1-1.fc13.x86_64
> php-pecl-imagick-0:2.2.2-4.fc12.x86_64
> inkscape-0:0.47-6.fc13.x86_64
> k3d-0:0.8.0.1-1.fc13.x86_64
> ImageMagick-c++-devel-0:6.5.8.10-6.fc13.x86_64
> drawtiming-0:0.7.1-1.fc13.x86_64
> pfstools-imgmagick-0:1.8.1-1.fc13.x86_64
> gdl-python-0:0.9-0.10.rc4.fc13.x86_64
> pfstools-0:1.8.1-1.fc13.x86_64
> k3d-0:0.7.11.0-6.fc13.x86_64
> inkscape-view-0:0.47-6.fc13.x86_64
> gdl-0:0.9-0.10.rc4.fc13.x86_64
>
>
>    
>> repoquery --repoid=rawhide --whatrequires --alldeps ImageMagick-c++
>> ImageMagick-c++-0:6.6.0.2-8.fc14.i686
>> ImageMagick-c++-0:6.6.0.2-8.fc14.x86_64
>> inkscape-0:0.48-0.2.20100505bzr.fc14.x86_64
>> ImageMagick-c++-devel-0:6.6.0.2-8.fc14.x86_64
>> gdl-0:0.9-0.12.rc4.fc14.x86_64
>> pfstools-imgmagick-0:1.8.1-1.fc14.x86_64
>> drawtiming-0:0.7.1-1.1.fc14.x86_64
>> pfstools-0:1.8.1-1.fc14.x86_64
>> ImageMagick-c++-devel-0:6.6.0.2-8.fc14.i686
>> k3d-0:0.8.0.1-1.fc14.x86_64
>> gdl-python-0:0.9-0.12.rc4.fc14.x86_64
>> inkscape-view-0:0.48-0.2.20100505bzr.fc14.x86_64
>> BTW, some subpackages contain .la files, you should remove them in %install.
>> e.g.
>>      
> This is not necessarily good advice either:
> 1) As these la files are for plugins which are located outside of %{_libdir},
> they do no harm
> 2) In the past there have been cases with plugins where the libraries plugins
> loading mechanism relies on the .la files being present, that might very well
> be the case here.
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>    
Very interesting.
Actually spec file contain string to delete in root build directory:
rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/*.la
What can happened bad if I do:
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name "*.la" -exec rm -f {} \;
as Chen Lei suggested before?

Actually I done that, but update is not pushed yet.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to