Rex Dieter wrote: % yum includes arch/release subdirs under /var/cache/yum, the important part % is the "release" part. So, it is theoretically easy to identify which parts % are worth keeping and which ones are not (ie, does the release/ subdir match % the current release or not). ie, % $ ls -F /var/cache/yum/x86_64/ % 24/ % % PackageKit seems to follow that practice at least partially: % $ ls -F /var/cache/PackageKit/ % 24/ downloads/ metadata/ % % dnf seems to not do that, but I'd suggest adding that could help.
Dnf left releasever out intentionally. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173107 -- Michael Mráka Software Management Engineering, Red Hat -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org