On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 5:21 PM Chris Murphy <li...@colorremedies.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Christopher <ctubb...@fedoraproject.org>
> wrote:
> > So, it would seem at some point, without me noticing (certainly my fault,
> > for not paying attention enough), the Hadoop packages got orphaned and/or
> > retired? in Fedora.
> >
> > This is a big problem for me, because the main package I work on is
> > dependent upon Hadoop.
> >
> > What's the state of Hadoop in Fedora these days? Are there packaging
> > problems? Not enough support from upstream Apache community? Missing
> > dependencies in Fedora? Not enough time to work on it? No interest from
> > users?
>
>
> Looks like packages it depended on were orphaned, almost a year ago (?)
>
>
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/BTYJNZV5LKLJYS2QZDSVX3CRECNLERTV/
>
>
Forgive me, but I have a really hard time parsing those massive reports
(especially when they appear in an active list like this).

But, it looks like that was due to  erlang-jsx being orphaned, which
affected libthrift-java, which affected accumulo and a bunch of others. It
looks like erlang-jsx was picked back up, and in any case, I'm pretty sure
it was an optional dependency of libthrift-java, so it could have been
fixed by the thrift developer (by dropping erlang support) even if
erlang-jsx was dropped.

So, I don't think that report a year ago caused the situation we're in
today.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to