On Qui, 2016-06-09 at 12:59 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > I maintain a package which comes with some benchmarking tools. I > would like to package these, but they have very generic names like > "boot-benchmark", "analysis". Also the tools are very specialized -- > you would only want them if you already know you need them.
I think is the same question of "/usr/share vs /usr/libexec" and also vs /usr/lib https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2015-April/210148.html if are binaries /usr/libexec , if lot of stuff /usr/share/ (and not only binaries) > I wonder if people have opinions on the best way to package > these. It > seems to me the options are: > > (1) Put them in %{_bindir} as they are. Likely a bad idea. > > (2) Put them in some other binary directory. Not sure which though, > maybe %{_libdir}/%{name}/ ? > > (3) Rename them and put them in %{_bindir}. This is technically > difficult, because the binaries have manual pages which would all > have > to be patched to refer to the new names. > > Rich. > -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
