On Monday, 05 September 2016 at 16:05, Michal Luscon wrote: > On 09/05/2016 03:52 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > On Friday, 02 September 2016 at 19:32, Peter Robinson wrote: > > [...] > > > > > > Sounds like this scope would warrant a Change? > > > > > The components should be already prepared for DNF-2 and the changes > > > > > are not huge. There's the FESCO ticket [5]. If it is not accepted then > > > > > we will submit a Change. > > > > Actually, the preferred approach would be for this to come to FESCo > > > > *as* a > > > > Change. Mostly because the Change Process requires you to explain the > > > > situation > > > > fully and establish a contingency plan. > > > Completely agree, we (rel-eng and I'm sure others) don't want to find > > > out one day everything is broken due to this change and the compose is > > > up the spout. Core components such as dnf need to follow the process > > > properly and communicate far and wide so people are aware of the > > > changes in flight that could affect everything from builds to users > > > updating. > > FESCo requested that a System Wide Change should be submitted for this. > > > Ok, we will file a System Wide Change then.
Excellent, thank you! Regards, Dominik -- Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
