On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 6:09 AM, Michael Catanzaro <mcatanz...@gnome.org> wrote: > On Fri, 2016-09-30 at 11:50 +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >> a bunch of patches which resulted from your report have now been >> merged >> into systemd upsteam (https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/6740e >> c4a6), >> which should, I hope, fix the issues you mentioned. > > Cool. > > But is it still required to disable SELinux to use it? If the SELinux > developers are unable to fix issues identified as priorities by the > desktop team, it impacts my consideration of whether we should continue > to enable SELinux in Workstation.
Egads, really?! That seems awfully extreme. On the matter of probability, it's easy to argue we'll get better bug information gathering with coredumptctl+abrt enabled reports compared to the higher risk with SELinux disabled. But that sounds like it requires a qualified risk assessment. -- Chris Murphy _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
