On Thu, 2016-10-13 at 19:33 +1000, Jeff Fearn wrote: > > > That's not the intent of the fields as I understand them. 'severity' is > > supposed to represent how bad the bug is, whereas 'priority' is > > supposed to represent how important it is to get it fixed compared to > > other bugs in the same component. They're obviously related, but not > > the same, and it's not "severity is the reporter's opinion, priority is > > the maintainers' opinion", no. > > My understanding is based on ye olde services plan: > > "Bugzilla Severity and Priority > > When filing a new bug report, or actioning an existing bug, it is > important to bear in mind that, while both the 'Severity' and 'Priority' > fields are required; 'Priority' is an internal weighting and 'Severity' > is customer weighting. This distinction can cause confusion if not > consistant." > > This is only significant in that it may have impacted the way they are > coded on BRC. > > > I think you might be right that we allow the bug reporter to set > > 'severity', though. > > BRC carries a custom patch to restrict priority to a group besides > editbugs group (the setpriority group), AFAICT there is no code that > allows similar restriction of the severity field.
Ah, interesting. I don't really have any particular source for my understanding of them, it's just something I've been carrying around for a while, I guess. However, Fedora definitely does not handle bugs the same as RHEL, so we're not necessarily *bound* by that definition...but we could use it if we liked. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
