On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Petr Šabata <con...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi! > > during the Tuesday's Modularity WG meeting I was talking about the status > of the Base Runtime prototype build and the package build failures we > encountered during our latest attempt. The meeting log is here: > > https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/modularity_wg/modularity_wg.2016-11-29-15.00.log.html > > In short: To bootstrap the Modularity infra (yeah, it's still not done) > we took a (fairly large) set of packages directly from Fedora 25 RC3 > and put them all in one, self-hosting module, currently misleadingly > labeled as base-runtime. The next step was to rebuild this set using > only the packages in it, preferrably twice, to prove it works, produces > the same, reproducible builds (or as close as we can get) and to save us > from sudden, unexpected breakage later when we need to touch components > deep in the [build] dependency chain. > > (Since this is a common question: No, the final Base Runtime module, > or the Generational Core stack it is part of, won't be self-hosting and > we won't be shipping the entire set we're currently working with under > that name.) > > We attempted to rebuild 2943 SRPMs and encountered 152 failures. > The reasons vary and include undiscovered conditional build dependencies, > undeclared build or runtime dependencies in combination with recent > buildroot and other package dependency chains changes, packages no > longer being compatible with their updated dependencies, random hangs > or non-deterministic, randomly failing test suites, to name a few. > > Some but not all of those affect, and can be reproduced in, the traditional > Fedora release, too, and fixing these issues is not only crucial for the > upcoming modular Fedora 26 Server but will benefit the standard Fedora > release as well. > > We'll be working on resolving these failures during the upcoming few weeks > -- via FTBFS bug reports or immediate fixes in the most trivial cases. > We'll use the following tracker bug for this purpose: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1400162 > > For the curious, the logs are here: > https://psabata.fedorapeople.org/f25rc3-failures/ Would be nice to get name of packages + their (co-)maintainer list. > > And the modulemd input for this build is here: > http://pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/cgit/modules/base-runtime.git/tree/base-runtime.yaml?id=d2485512c7916304e73fabc5db422798eb2be1d5 Wondering why rubygem*, jboss*, nodejs* and gstreamer* are there... > > If you maintain some of these FTBFS'd packages, feel free to fix them > even before we get to you! :) Just, please, let us know if you do. > > Finally, some quick test instructions: Make sure your package builds > in F25 and Rawhide. If it does, check whether it also builds in mock > using this configuration file: https://paste.fedoraproject.org/494173/ > If it works there as well, chances are it's fine. > > Thank you in advance, > P > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >
-- -Igor Gnatenko _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
