Hi Michael I'm not sure of what packaging mistakes you are talking. I just updated the spec file and removed the requires field.
But yes, I'd like to give it for review now. Bests, Joël On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 10:04 PM, Michael Schwendt <mschwe...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, 9 Dec 2016 21:57:07 +0100, Joël Krähemann wrote: > >> Hi all >> >> Just modified the gsequencer.spec file. Now, it should be more the fedora >> way. >> >> https://sourceforge.net/projects/ags/files/fedora/ >> >> Additionally, I uploaded the srpm and rpm packages built. >> >> * gsequencer >> * gsequencer-devel >> * gsequencer-devel-docs >> * gsequencer-debuginfo > > So, do you want to offer it for official package review or not? > It still contains a lot of packaging mistakes _not_ specific to Fedora. > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
