Igor Gnatenko <ignate...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Well there is gcc-arm-linux-gnu for example but that's for kernels per
> > description
> Didn't see it before... But looks like it doesn't work either:
> /usr/bin/arm-linux-gnu-ld: cannot find crt1.o: No such file or directory
> /usr/bin/arm-linux-gnu-ld: cannot find crti.o: No such file or directory
> /usr/bin/arm-linux-gnu-ld: cannot find -lc
> /usr/bin/arm-linux-gnu-ld: cannot find crtn.o: No such file or directory
Yeah - it's intended for building kernels (though it can build anything that
provides its own userspace).
There are a number of reasons I *don't* provide userspaces:
(0) I build cross-compilers for 20-ish arches (note that not all kernel
arches are actually supported by upstream gcc and binutils).
(1) No single upstream C library supports all the arches I can build a
cross-compiler for, so I would have to include multiple C libraries in
the SRPM and build some arches differently to others. Some I won't be
able to bootstrap at all without an old or hacked version of a C library.
(2) Do I bootstrap-build a single config for each arch or several configs?
What one or ones do I pick? Note that not all configs of a single arch
are necessarily supported by the same C library (consider MMU vs NOMMU).
Further note that each bootstrap increases the build footprint and
installation footprint - and at some point the package will become
unbuildable.
IMHO, it shouldn't be necessary for the compiler to know anything about the C
library...
David
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
