On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 1:42 PM, Dennis Gilmore <den...@ausil.us> wrote: > On jueves, 5 de enero de 2017 1:35:28 PM CST Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Dennis Gilmore <den...@ausil.us> wrote: >> > On jueves, 5 de enero de 2017 11:03:50 AM CST Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> >> # Overview >> >> >> >> For many years, Fedora has supported multilib by carrying >> >> parallel-installable libraries in /usr/lib[64]. This was necessary for a >> >> very long time in order to support 32-bit applications running on a >> >> 64-bit >> >> deployment. However, in today's new container world, there is a whole new >> >> option. >> >> >> >> I'd like to propose that we consider moving away from our traditional >> >> approach to multilib in favor of recommending the use of a 32-bit >> >> container >> >> runtime when needed on a 64-bit host. >> > >> > I am not opposed, however I think we should possibly just have people >> > enable the 32 bit x86 repo instead of your proposal >> >> Multilib exists on non-x86 architectures. Should this proposal gain >> traction, we need to consider the implications to those architectures. > its been killed off on all other arches.
I stand corrected. For some reason I thought it still existed on ppc64, but that is clearly not the case. josh _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
