On Jul 14, 2017, at 11:30 AM, Richard Hughes <hughsi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 14 July 2017 at 19:12, Andrew Lutomirski <l...@mit.edu> wrote: >> As above, it could be the exact same sandbox technology with the same >> portals and everything. The sandboxed program would just be files in >> /usr instead of a Flatpak. > > How could that work? The runtime gets mounted in /usr and the app gets > mounted in /app in a different place. > https://media.readthedocs.org/pdf/flatpak/latest/flatpak.pdf is a good > read.
I don't see the problem. The runtime could be all of /use and the app could be a symlink living in /app that points at /usr. The latter could be created on the fly in a tmpfs. Or the flatpak runtime could learn to accept a special type of manifest that just says to run /usr/bin/whatever and not worry about /app. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
