De: "Owen Taylor" > But I want to be clear that there is no *proposal* on the > table to ship things Flatpak only, and *no proposed timescale*. And > there won't be until we know how the tools work out for packagers, how > Flatpak usage works out for users, and we have a significant body of > Fedora packages built as Flatpaks to look at things like installed size > and network usage.
Then I'm glad there is absolutely no plan to preempt flatpack technical assessment by shipping one or more GNOME apps as flatpack-only, leaving Fedora users for whom flatpack does not work yet behind, and bypassing distribution consensus processes. This kind of action would be really divisive¹, especially while simultaneously seeking Fedora endorsement. Best regards, ¹ Those shortcuts rarely end well. Even when the missing bits are eventually added, users have a long memory of being left in the dust because their use-cases are deemed "wrong" or "uninteresting". -- Nicolas Mailhot _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
