On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 01:47:28PM +0200, Adam Samalik wrote: > The Modularity team has published a first round of Boltron feedback: > https://docs.pagure.org/modularity/prototype/boltron/feedback.html
From what I've seen on social media, response is largely positive. Congratulations everyone! (And thanks!). The thing that jumps out immediately is that respondents _really_ prefer the "dnf module install httpd" syntax — 73% love or like that, while 7% dislike or hate it. 21% love or like "dnf install httpd" for installing modules, while 46% dislike or hate it. And a full half of that dislike is hate, or in other words more people completely hate it than like or love it _combined_. The "dnf install @httpd" syntax gets just a little bit less hate, but also less love. "dnf module install" is also seen as backwards compatible, although weirdly by fewer people than who like it. (I guess the people that make up the difference see the whole thing as not backwards compatible? Maybe they're confused with _forward_ compatibility?) Also, people are not particularly keen on but accepting of the idea that multiple streams of a module can't be installed in parallel. And people *definitely* love updates staying on the same stream, which is good, because that's kind of the whole point. -- Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
