>>>>> "MH" == Miro Hrončok <mhron...@redhat.com> writes:
MH> I just had a discussion with Tomáš Orsava and Petr Viktorin on MH> #fedora-python. Rather than asking FESCo now to allow mass MH> fully-automated spec changing, we'll open bugs as planned, but we'll MH> attach patches generated by your script to them. It's not really required that you get an ACK from FESCo for automated spec changes as long as you have a clear plan, people on hand to fix any breakage, and let the devel list know about the changes you're making. The packaging guidelines are pretty clear about maintainers needing to be prepared for automated changes to their specs. But of course you can run it by either FESCo or the packaging committee if you really want to cover your bases. The relevant guideline section is https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Spec_Maintenance_and_Canonicity Of course, if you wait just a bit you'll be able to submit pull requests to pagure, but that could get kind of messy. To be honest, though, just fixing things for people where you can tell those fixes are clean and easy is far preferable to opening bugs. In fact, it's specifically encouraged. In any case, before you get to that please do follow the policy for pass package changes: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mass_package_changes - J< _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org