On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 10:38:15AM -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > >Yeah, that would get crazy fast. The 6 month granularity proposal > >should help*some*, and we should probably go into this carefully. > > Technically, the SL for the module could have the narrow meaning > referring to the module only, and the tools could follow the chain > of dependencies and display it as: > > Service Level: 6 months (effective SL: 3 months/EOL: 2017-11-08 due > to dependency on openSSL)
Ouch. Yes, but I think that that should be a warning sent to the module maintainers (and collectively to devel list) rather than show to end users. -- Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
