On Thu, 2017-08-24 at 09:12 +0200, Remi Collet wrote: > Le 24/08/2017 à 08:58, Adam Williamson a écrit : > > On Thu, 2017-08-24 at 06:44 +0200, Remi Collet wrote: > > > Le 24/08/2017 à 02:32, Moez Roy a écrit : > > > > > > > The soname bump requires packages that depend on it need to be rebuilt, > > > > so > > > > I updated ImageMagick to 7.0.6-9. > > > > > > > > > Such a version bump in stable branch is not acceptable. > > > > > > ImageMagick 7 removed lot of functions (deprecated in v6) > > > > > > Especially as ImageMagick 6 is still maintained. > > > > > > BTW, latest version 6.9.9-9 also have some API changes > > > > > > - 6.9.6-8 => bump to .3 > > > - 6.9.7-6 => bump to .4 > > > - 6.9.9-0 => bump to .5 > > > > > > Yes, this package is a nightmare. > > > > Note the versioning is a bit subtle. What was released upstream was > > 6.9.9-9 , which in our versioning would be 6.9.9.9 . Upstream *didn't* > > go from 6.9.8 to 6.9.9, but from 6.9.9-8 to 6.9.9-9. The package in > > Fedora before all this mess was versioned 6.9.9.3 , which I believe > > would be upstream's 6.9.9-3 , and I *think* there is no ABI/API > > incompatibility between 6.9.9-3 and 6.9.9-9. The soname in the 6.9.9.3 > > packages was already > > "libMagickCore-6.Q16.so.5()(64bit)". > > Yes in F27+ (6.9.9.3) > > F25/F26 have 6.9.3.0 (upstream 6.9.3-0) with > libMagickCore-6.Q16.so.2 > libMagickWand-6.Q16.so.2
Yep, I just looked back and saw that nirik built upstream 6.9.9-3 but hadn't actually sent it as an update, since it was an soname bump and all the necessary rebuilds weren't done yet :/ -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
