On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 09:44:31PM +0200, Alexander Boström wrote:
> > But for basics such as "chkconfig service on|off|--list", there should 
> > be compatibility. 
> 
> Yes. I basically use:
> 
> chkconfig foo on
> chkconfig foo off
> env LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 chkconfig --list | fgrep :on |awk '{print $1}

I agree, these are my main uses too, with the rare per-runlevel tweak.

The last ("what is supposed to be 'on' right now?") is pretty ugly -- if the
new thing provides a convenient interface to do the same thing, that'd be a
win.


> 
> The rest I don't really care about.
> 
> But the thing to remember: If systemd-install is too complicated to use,
> people will keep using chkconfig and service instead and ignore the
> warning. That's why it's important to have something that supports
> everything that systemd does while still being simple to use. I don't
> care if that's an extended chkconfig or systemd-install or something
> else.
> 
> Constructive ideas about how to improve systemd-install should be taken
> seriously.
> 
> I do like systemd, btw. I also like pulseaudio. And selinux. :)
> 
> /Alexander
> 
> 
> -- 
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> 

-- 
Matthew Miller <mat...@mattdm.org>
Senior Systems Architect -- Instructional & Research Computing Services
Harvard School of Engineering & Applied Sciences
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to