On 21/09/17 08:02 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
>
>
> On 21 September 2017 at 07:17, Luya Tshimbalanga
> <l...@fedoraproject.org <mailto:l...@fedoraproject.org>> wrote:
>
>     Sparkleshare package is currently behind upstream which just reach
>     2.0[1][2]
>     The maintainer was contacted for updating the package with current
>     broken dependency below on Fedora 27 and above:
>
>      Problem: package sparkleshare-1.2.0-8.fc26.x86_64 requires
>     mono(webkit-sharp) = 1.1.15.0, but none of the providers can be
>     installed
>       - conflicting requests
>       - nothing provides webkitgtk needed by
>     webkit-sharp-0.3-19.fc26.x86_64
>
>      but no response so far[3][4].
>     As the application is used by Design Team, could someone make the
>     change because I cannot access it?
>     Thanks in advance,
>
>     Luya
>
>     References
>     --------------
>     [1] https://github.com/hbons/SparkleShare/releases/tag/2.0.0
>     <https://github.com/hbons/SparkleShare/releases/tag/2.0.0>
>     [2] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/sparkleshare
>     <https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/sparkleshare>
>     [3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151172
>     <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151172>
>     [4] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375789
>     <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375789>
>
>
>
> A quick look of course shows this to be an issue with the retiring of
> webkitgtk as that's no longer in the repos for webkit-sharp to build
> against, which then means sparkleshare doesn't have its dependency
> satisfied.
>
> According to the sparkleshare release notes[0] the 1.3.0 release added
> the gtk3 bindings... so any of those ought to help.
>
> The build dependencies are more complex than I can do in a few minutes
> though[1]
>
> The 2.0 release the release notes states has breaking changes from 1.X
> ... 
>
> To get this updated someone needs to package webkit2-sharp (and any
> dependencies that needs to build) ... gtk-sharp3 is already packaged
> though which should help.
>
> They say that as of 2.0 they have a flatpak release - have you tried
> that so at least you'll have access to the application in F27?
>
Wearing Design Suite lab maintainer's hat, I would love to include a
flatpak version of 2.0 as default for F27 if there is a proper mechanism
to do so.

Just a quick look, I made a spec file for guideline[1]

References
---------------
[1] https://luya.fedorapeople.org/packages/SPECS/webkit2-sharp.spec


-- 
Luya Tshimbalanga
Graphic & Web Designer
E: l...@fedoraproject.org
W: http://www.coolest-storm.net

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to