On Fri, 2017-10-13 at 10:38 -0700, Josh Stone wrote: > On 10/12/2017 05:34 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > In this case there's an even worse consequence; if you do attempt to > > update to nss 3.33.0 without nspr 4.17.0 dnf will 'skip' *most* of the > > nss packages (as it notices that they are missing dependencies), but it > > *will* install nss-softokn-freebl . With this mix of packages (most of > > nss at 3.32.0, but nss-softokn-freebl at 3.33.0), nss and anything that > > depends on it just fails to work at all - e.g. curl and dnf...so that's > > an extremely bad outcome. > > Then isn't this a packaging bug? They currently use ">=" requirements, > but if a greater version doesn't work, shouldn't they be "="?
Well, there's *additionally* probably a packaging bug, yeah: nss- softokn-freebl should be more strictly tied to the other packages. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
