Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) said: > > * if we continue to require sysVinit scripts in the guidlines, this is true. > > * If we don't, then sysadmins that have to install packages without sysvinit > > scripts will have to deal with writing their own init scripts. > > My take on this is that sysvinit scripts should be a requirement, and > systemd unit files an optional addition. Given that the guidelines have > not been updated in any way this is basically what the guideliness > currently say.
I would say until we get a coherent story and guidelines on the packaging, activation, etc. of systemd unit files in a way that's unlikely to change long-term, that systemd unit files should not be encouraged. I don't want to have to train packagers each release. That being said, from reading the rest of this thread, it looks like we're making progress on that front. Bill -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
