On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 11:34 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Adam Williamson (awill...@redhat.com) said: > > > The 'not separating the scripts into a separate subpackage' bit. > > > > Ah. I thought the point of separating them wasn't to allow for multiple > > init systems, but because our current guidance was to use sysvinit > > scripts by default, not upstart scripts; so with them separated off, you > > only get the upstart native script if you manually install it. > > The referenced packages aren't using upstart jobs as a replacement for > traditional SysV service scripts... they're using upstart for things that > don't really fit in the service paradigm.
Ah, I see, that makes sense then. Thanks. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
