On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 11:34 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Adam Williamson (awill...@redhat.com) said: 
> > > The 'not separating the scripts into a separate subpackage' bit.
> > 
> > Ah. I thought the point of separating them wasn't to allow for multiple
> > init systems, but because our current guidance was to use sysvinit
> > scripts by default, not upstart scripts; so with them separated off, you
> > only get the upstart native script if you manually install it.
> 
> The referenced packages aren't using upstart jobs as a replacement for
> traditional SysV service scripts... they're using upstart for things that
> don't really fit in the service paradigm.

Ah, I see, that makes sense then. Thanks.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to