Hi, Till.
On Saturday, 30 December 2017 at 17:27, Till Hofmann wrote:
[...]
> So, I'm wondering:
> 1. Can I add "Provides: bear = %{version}-%{release}", as bear does not
> provide a bear binary package? To me, this seems risky and confusing,
> but it would solve the issue.
> 2. If not, would it make sense to rename the current bear (source)
> package into something else, e.g., bear-factory, so we can use 'bear'
> for the compilation database?
Option 2 makes most sense in light of what you wrote. Thank you for
the thorough research on this matter. If I were the current bear
package maintainer, I'd agree with your reasoning.
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org
There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and
oppression to develop psychic muscles.
-- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
