----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jason L Tibbitts III" <ti...@math.uh.edu>
> To: "nicolas mailhot" <nicolas.mail...@laposte.net>
> Cc: gol...@lists.fedoraproject.org, "Development discussions related to
> Fedora" <devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>,
> "Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora"
> <packag...@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2018 6:00:24 PM
> Subject: Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging
>
> I wish this message wasn't crossposted everywhere, but I don't want to
> lose any discussion by trimming the CC list. Sorry if replies generate
> bounces for some.
>
> >>>>> "nm" == nicolas mailhot <nicolas.mail...@laposte.net> writes:
>
> nm> And the forge macros are now available since
> nm> redhat-rpm-config-73-1.fc28 (I had missed the push due to upstream
> nm> renaming the file). Heartfelt thanks to Jason Tibbitts !
>
> Please don't forget to let me know when it's time to start thinking
> about pushing this down to F27. And maybe F26. And as far as I can
> tell it should work with only minor modification in EPEL7 (via
> epel-rpm-macros). I don't know about EPEL6, but we really should look
> at it given some of the other discussions about specfile compatibility.
> Some packagers wouldn't ever use it if it doesn't work everywhere.
>
I think that it would be great to land it also in the EPEL6/7.
JC
> Finally, we should also talk about whether there is any integration or
> automation possible between fedpkg and specfiles configured with these
> macros.
>
> - J<
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
