I've been receiving e-mails that say that one of my packages has broken dependencies, but I believe the dependencies are satisfied. Is the system that generates these e-mails unaware of rich rpm dependencies, perhaps?
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Broken dependencies: rust-chan
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 23:09:08 +0000 (UTC)
From: build...@fedoraproject.org
To: rust-chan-ow...@fedoraproject.org
rust-chan has broken dependencies in the F-28 tree:
On x86_64:
rust-chan-devel-0.1.21-2.fc28.noarch requires (crate(rand) >= 0.4.0
with crate(rand) < 0.5.0)
On armhfp:
rust-chan-devel-0.1.21-2.fc28.noarch requires (crate(rand) >= 0.4.0
with crate(rand) < 0.5.0)
On ppc64le:
rust-chan-devel-0.1.21-2.fc28.noarch requires (crate(rand) >= 0.4.0
with crate(rand) < 0.5.0)
On aarch64:
rust-chan-devel-0.1.21-2.fc28.noarch requires (crate(rand) >= 0.4.0
with crate(rand) < 0.5.0)
On ppc64:
rust-chan-devel-0.1.21-2.fc28.noarch requires (crate(rand) >= 0.4.0
with crate(rand) < 0.5.0)
On s390x:
rust-chan-devel-0.1.21-2.fc28.noarch requires (crate(rand) >= 0.4.0
with crate(rand) < 0.5.0)
On i386:
rust-chan-devel-0.1.21-2.fc28.noarch requires (crate(rand) >= 0.4.0
with crate(rand) < 0.5.0)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
