On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 05:52:05PM +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 10:25 +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 07:20:18PM +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 19:50 +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > > > I did another mass rebuild with a specially-tweaked gcc in order
> > > > to
> > > > find out
> > > > which packages need to be rebuild with patched gcc-8.0.1-0.16.
> > >
> > > How we find out the same problem in packages from external repos ?
> >
> > I don't know; I've only rebuilt all rawhide packages.
>
> You rebuilt all packages and found what packages was different ? that'sit ?
The bug affected solely x86_64 and the test mass rebuilt was thus performed
solely on x86_64, on non-koji boxes (even when the compiler for checking
this was twice as slow as normally). Rebuilding all packages again on all
architectures would be certainly much more CPU time.
Jakub
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
