On 03/08/2018 01:32 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Why must the process change? It seems every bit of Fedora in the past > year has been changing... for the sake of change.
We've had extreme issues with stability in Rawhide lately that could have been prevented with automated testing. These issues cost a lot of time from infrastructure, QA, and release engineering members. They also caused us to be unable to compose Rawhide and Fedora 28 for quite some time. Not all of these issues would have been caught by package gating, but some would. > I'm going to speak up now and be a little more involved. +1! > Do you want Rawhide used the same as Fedora N releases? If you want that > I propose we remove Fedora N-1 releases. When branched occurs I have to > switch branches four times. I'd much rather invest time in removing the > need to support Fedora N-1 and if that means gating for Rawhide I can > get on board. I don't think making Rawhide used the same as Fedora N releases is the goal here, though I think it would also improve things for people who do choose to use Rawhide. I personally think we should continue to support N-1. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
