On 06/07/2018 06:50 AM, Jan Pokorný wrote:
> On 14/05/18 17:19 +0200, David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] wrote:
>> does anybody know if the files /etc/profile.d/lang.{csh,sh}
>> are still used these days, and what for?
>> Do we still need them in Fedora?
>> Should they be installed by default these days?
>>
>> Any info is appreciated! :)
>
> Frankly, had no idea about that file but apparently it's needed (or
> something to that effect) so as to have non-ascii characters rendered
> correctly in the terminal-within-WM settings (sway + urxvt256c-ml).
> I am not sure what the cause was, could be just missing
> LANG=en_US.UTF-8 in the environment -- no idea what's the
> intended authoritative "automagic" source for that otherwise.
> Or does it mean one shouldn't trust the distribution for
> this common convenience anymore?
>
> Please be more considerate even to Rawhide package consumers next time
> around and coordinate file migrations between packages properly.
> I can see that these files were moved to setup package, but alas,
> that hasn't been rebuilt yet. Perhaps versioned dependency or even
> path-based one would be justified in this case to prevent unexpected
> regressions.setup was rebuilt... but I untagged it from f29 due to: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585321 (new initscripts conflicted with chkconfig, then when I untagged that the old initscripts conflicted with setup). I just tagged it back in. So, please direct any ire at me, not David. It was coordinated, just got sidetracked. kevin
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/WGBJBVKKTBI7ABANGTKMWQ4ES6K7I5FM/
