On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 3:50 PM Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 03:02:47PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > Correct, this is about ensuring that all Fedora installations have > > > access to the modules we build, but there's no change to how > > > they're stored on mirrors, etc. > > Ok. Do we ever foresee the hybrid repository approach happening in > Fedora? > > The hybrid approach is "things can be built as modules, but tagged into > the base", right? What problems does this solve vs. allowing modules to > be used as dependencies and build deps? > > I think the "hybrid approach" he's referring to is having modular and non-modular RPMs living in the same directory structure. I don't see that being needed in Fedora at this point. If he *does* mean the above, I think that's going to be solved by Ursa Major (long explanation available on request), but that's probably an F30+ feature. And yeah, that will basically be allowing modules to be a dep for non-modular content.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MDYU7HZLVD6GUDKZKIE7Z4PNKXXEZD6K/
