On Mo, 25.06.18 13:46, Gerd Hoffmann (kra...@redhat.com) wrote: > Hi, > > > > > Which file system do you have in mind even for this? > > > > > > Unspecified for now. i.e. no change. It would remain ext4 by default I > > > expect, but ultimately whatever anaconda allows. > > IMHO the only thing which is reasonable here would be something simple > with posix semantics, which is unlikely to change on-disk format anytime > soon. So symlinks are working (which appears to be used by atomic / > ostree), which is something vfat can't support. > > ext2 looks like a good pick here. Simple, posix, no journal replay > issues, and drivers for non-linux systems are relatively widespread.
Well, is ext2 currently well maintained? ext4 is, sure, but ext2? I sounds questionnable to me to commit to some file system that is clearly on its way out pretty much everywhere, and that since years. I mean, fat isn't really the epitome of file systems, but it *is* generally very well supported, all across systems, and it's not really on its way anywhere at all... Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DVYG64P6CGBO7QAUD4GQRIVMJ6HLN7PN/
