Hi Zbigniew, >>> Also, what is the relationship between >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BINUTILS230 >>> and >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BINUTILS231 >> >> BINUTILS230 was the change request to bring in FSF binutils 2.30. This >> is the version that is currently used in rawhide. >> >> BINUTILS231 is the change request to bring in FSF binutils 2.31. The >> 2.31 release has not actually happened yet - it is scheduled for July 7 >> - but if it does happen in time then I would like to get it into rawhide >> before the mass rebuild happens. Then if there are any problems they >> should show up quickly. > > But changes are specific to a Fedora release. If users see both changes > in the release notes for F29 they will be justifiably confused. So I think > BINUTILS230 should be automatically dropped (superseded) if BINUTILS231 > makes it into F29.
Oh, right, now I understand. I agree, we should drop BINUTILS230 if BINUTUILS231 makes it in. Cheers Nick _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/HECVLJ6IEUS7KOBJSZ4OUTUXRYWPTDCH/
