On 2018-07-20 00:26, Artur Iwicki wrote: > I looked at libattr and in the changelog, there's this: >> * Tue Jul 17 2018 Kamil Dudka <kdu...@redhat.com> 2.4.48-3 >> - temporarily provide attr/xattr.h symlink until users are migrated >> (#1601482) > > The bugzilla ticket says that attr/xattr.h was removed from libattr and is > now a symlink to sys/xattr.h. Taking a look at those two files, the old > attr/xattr.h has these lines in it: >> #ifndef ENOATTR >> # define ENOATTR ENODATA /* No such attribute */ >> #endif > These are absent in sys/xattr.h, so the compiler rightfully complains that it > does not know of ENOATTR. I guess you should either add a patch that replaces > usages of ENOATTR to ENODATA, or a patch that adds this define somewhere.
Thanks Artur for your findings! Trying to report that problem upstream I founded this thread: https://github.com/iustin/pyxattr/pull/15 I will give it a few days to work out some general way to solve it. Marcin -- https://blog.solidsoft.info/ - Working code is not enough _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/XDBPYWNUBEMRVB3KH2BJGUGCTY2NTO5A/
