On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 4:48 AM, Vít Ondruch <vondr...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > "new-sources" should not be mentioned in basic documentation. These should > be added via means of "fedpkg import package.srpm". > > The workflow for new package is then: > > ~~~ > $ fedpkg import mypackage.srpm > $ git commit -m "initial import" > ~~~ > > and for updated package: > > ~~~ > $ git add -u > $ fedpkg clog > $ git commit -F clog > $ fedpkg import updated.srpm > $ git commit --am > ~~~ > > This way, the question if the file is stored in lookaside cache or git is > done by fedpkg. Also please note that the "import" command removes patches > which are not used any longer (not sure if it adds new patches ...). > > > Thanks. If fedpkg has this capability IMO it should be referenced in the package maintenance guide. I understand that documentation is boring, but if someone makes a change or adds capability to a package, they need to take a few moments to update references to those capabilities in the documentation - especially if that documentation is something as important as the "package maintenance guide". I reference the guide every single time I make changes to packages - just to ensure I'm following the current rules. At least for me, it's vital that these instructions are current and correct.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/BC65GAULZEJFR4O5HRT2EPRASESCLBU6/
