On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 7:27 AM Rex Dieter <rdie...@math.unl.edu> wrote:
> Jan Rybar wrote: > > > Hi Abhiram, > > > > you can make COPR. No one asks, no harm done, everyone's happy. > > I don't think copr is appropriate either, > https://docs.pagure.org/copr.copr/user_documentation.html#faq > > To me, makes it pretty clear that if it can't be in fedora, it can't be in > copr either. > You need to go through the code (maybe use licensecheck -r to help) to see if all the code is acceptable. If so I'll defer to Neal on the COPR acceptability. Another alternative is until formal support is added to the kernel you can look at packaging it in RPM Fusion. If it's truly FOSS but just not acceptable because it's a kernel module it can go in the Free repository. If it's using proprietary code (even if the project is GPL licensed) then as long as it's redistributable, it can go in the Non-Free repository. Thanks, Richard
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
