On Thursday, 04 October 2018 at 14:11, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Thu, 2018-10-04 at 14:02 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > wrote: > > On Tuesday, 02 October 2018 at 19:02, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > I'm preparing an update of gflags > > > libgflags.so.2.1 => libgflags.so.2.2 > > > > This looks like a minor bump, not SONAME change. What does > > objdump -p | grep SONAME > > say about the two? > > I got broken dependencies [1] > > package glog-0.3.5-3.fc28.x86_64 requires > libgflags.so.2.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - cannot install both gflags-2.1.2-6.fc28.x86_64 and gflags-2.2.1- > 1.fc28.x86_64 > - package glog-devel-0.3.5-3.fc28.x86_64 requires > libglog.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - package gflags-devel-2.2.1-1.fc28.x86_64 requires > libgflags.so.2.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
Ok, it looks like upstream is not following the semantic versioning conventions and they really put major.minor inside the SONAME. Too bad. Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and oppression to develop psychic muscles. -- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
