Le dimanche 14 octobre 2018 à 18:13 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit : > Le dimanche 14 octobre 2018 à 15:37 +0200, Fabio Valentini a écrit : > > It looks like the forge macros weren't tested to be backwards > > compatible, because packages that build successfully now fail to > > build > > on rawhide (see, for example, build [0]). > > Fabio, > > You can’t assume the archive name returned by forge macros will be > stable over time.
And, BTW, I did lobby the lookaside maintainer last year to stop considering a source unit is a checksummed archive, but to consider two archives which content checksums the same as identical (checksum content not enveloppe, since enveloppes are not stable in our brand new web2 world). That went nowhere but feel free to explain him the problem better than me. -- Nicolas Mailhot _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
