On Sat, 2018-10-20 at 11:17 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: > Jonathan Dieter wrote: > > On Fri, 2018-10-19 at 21:37 -0700, Josh Stone wrote: > > > For aarch64, libatomic comes from the gcc-libraries source package, > > > which I believe only exists to provide runtime support for devtoolset. > > > It does not have libatomic.so, only libatomic.so.1 and .so.1.2.0. You > > > probably need to use devtoolset gcc to actually build+link it. > > > (Were those SCLs ever enabled for EPEL?) > > They were enabled in koji for EPEL-7. (In mock, they are > enabled for EPEL-6 as well.) > > > Ok, thanks for the explanation. Unless there's an easy BuildRequires I > > can add, I think I'll just leave duperemove out of EPEL. > > An example of using devtoolset in a spec file is here: > > > http://smoogespace.blogspot.com/2018/03/using-red-hat-developer-toolset-dts-in.html > > I don't know if that will work out easily for your situation > or not.
That did the job perfectly! Thanks for the pointer. Builds have just finished for EPEL. Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
